Mary Osborne
(1769-1821)

Mary Osborne ⁴ ^,5

Born: 4 Jun 1769, Bourne, Lincolnshire, England ⁴ ^,7
Christened: 8 Jul 1769, Bourne, Lincolnshire, England
Marriage (1): Dr. Richard Harris Beaumont on 26 Oct 1801 in Bourne, Lincolnshire, England ⁷
Died: 12 Oct 1821, Gravesend, Kent, England aged 52 ⁴ ^,6 ^,7 ^,10

Family Links

Spouses/Children:

1. Dr. Richard Harris Beaumont

(+ Shows person has known children.)

bullet Birth Notes:

Photo of Beaumont/James Family Tree in RAB's [2] possession confirms date and place of birth

bullet Death Notes:

http://books.google.co.za/books?id=9MZnclDVK98C&pg=PA475&lpg=PA475&dq=%22Richard+Harris+Beaumont%22&source=bl&ots=lrI9UDZ82l&sig=r2Dh30atWZAT6w71b1tAEkEHWss&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0v2jT86LK7OZ0QXG49DLCA&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Richard%20Harris%20Beaumont%22&f=false

bullet Sources of information or noted events in her life were:

• Web Based Info. http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=crumpler_tree&id=104913625

• General Comment. Photo of Beaumont/James Family Tree in RAB's [2] Possession records that -
"The (Osborne) family is descended from Osborne the Senechal to ##### Wiliam The Conqueror for gave Estates in Lincolnshire" (The writing is not 100% clear and this is as near as I can get it)

• General Comment. Photo of Beaumont/James Family Tree in RAB's [2] Possession says "Her children were baptised at St. Georges, Gravesend, Kent"

• General Comment. Richard Harris Beaumont is person # 8/78 on the Photo of Beaumont/James Family Tree in RAB's [2] Possession

• General Comment. ⁶ According to the Notes from MHB - "The Osborne's were descendants from Osborn, William the Conqueror's Seneschal to whom he gave land in Lincolnshire,"

• General Comment. The photograph came from HRE [1576]
Note on reverse by Russell Coombe [185] Exeter 20 March 1932: Photograph of a miniature by Charles Fox (who studied under "Edward of Bungay (?)") of Mrs Osborne whose daughter married my Great Grandfather Richard Harris Beaumont. Mrs Beaumont appears to have died young. I know of no existing portrait of her. The Osbornes lived at Bourne in Lincolnshire. The miniature is in my possession [Russell Coombe's] and is dated 1777."

Mary married Dr. Richard Harris Beaumont, son of Richard Beaumont and Ann Gigner, on 26 Oct 1801 in Bourne, Lincolnshire, England.⁷ (Dr. Richard Harris Beaumont was born in 1772 in Hemingford, Huntingdonshire, England,⁴ ^,7 ^,9 died on 10 Sep 1846 ⁴ ^,7 and was buried on 17 Sep 1846 in Milton-Next-Gravesend, Kent, England.)

bullet Sources of information or noted events in their marriage were:

• General Comment. The Photo in RAB's [2] Possession of the Beaumont/James Family tree confirm that Mary Osborne and Richard Harris were married and the that Mary's parents were Robert Osborne and Mary Gentle

• Marriage Contract. Confirmed in Photo of Beaumont/James Family Tree in RAB's [2] Possession

• Web Based Info. http://www.familysearch.org/eng/search/af/individual_record.asp?recid=6574520&lds=0&frompage=0

In this record there are three Marriage dates:-

21 Oct 1801
26 Oct 1800
26 Oct 1800

Beaumont Table of Contents | Beaumont Surnames | Beaumont Name List

There will inevitably be errors and omissions and the whole purpose of creating this online record, is to invite feedback and corrections.
The data is specifically for non-commercial use and my clear intention is to build family records. The data may, therefore, not be used in any way for the purposes of financial gain.

Caveat:- Throughout the project UK GRO birth, marriage and death index data appears. The GRO data appears in Quarters. Q1 = January, February and March, Q2 = April, May, June , Q3 = July, August and September and Q4 = October, November and December. Similarly, Mar Q = January, February and March, Jun Q = April, May, June , Sep Q = July, August and September and Dec Q = October, November and December. Where these dates occur, they represent the date of Registration of the event rather than the date of the actual event. Logically, registration occurs AFTER the event. In some cases this may be days or months or even years after the event. The important thing is that the event was recorded and a copy of the document of registration could be obtained if necessary. This also applies to South African NAAIRS records.

Similarly, the UK system is confusing to the uninitiated because registration districts can span several counties. Accordingly GRO locations may not record the true location of the event. They do record where the record is actually kept or recorded.

Caveat #2:- I have used URL's throughout the website as sources. The URLs are often from paid subscription sites so you may not be able to access them without an account. Inevitably there are broken URL's. I have been to every URL recorded here and at the time they were operational. In this regard, the Ancestry24 records are a problem. There are numerous references in the South African data citing Ancestry24 records. Unfortunately Ancestry24 has closed down and these records are no longer available on line.

The early South African records on this site would not have been as good as they are without the work done by Delia Robertson. Where there are website addresses containing http://www.e-family.co.za... I record the citation should read Robertson, Delia. The First Fifty Years Project. This website can be found at First Fifty Years

Mary Osborne 4,5

Mary Osborne ⁴ ^,5